Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Twilight: Love it or Hate it?
#41
Posted 06 May 2009 - 07:10 AM
Personally, I agree with almost everyone here. Bella's a Sue, Edward's obscenely annoying, Meyer can't write to save her life, etc.
I honesty have no idea how this book became a bestseller. It sounds like twelve year old fanfiction. I've read some of my sister's and my friend's written works, and they are a whole lot better than the overused crap Meyer came up with.
And c'mon. Sparkling vampires? Dear Lord...
#42
Posted 13 May 2009 - 10:11 AM
It sounds like twelve year old fanfiction.
I second that.
And I have read work by some of my friends that was more professionally done than that.
#43
Posted 18 May 2009 - 12:06 AM
#44
Posted 18 May 2009 - 01:09 AM
i've seen the film, but not read the books. and i was dragged to the film so when i saw Edward catch the falling apple in his hands, i laughed because i thought that was how significant the apple in the hands on the front cover was, just that one scene which had no importance. then a friend told me that the front cover symbolises forbidden fruit, what with the whole story line. i thought to myself "my god, the damn author actually did something subtle!" but then i thought "hmm....better ask the folks on the NiD forums whether this is actually subtle, or if a song and dance is made out of the apple and forbidden fruit!" and so, is it?
I don't know about the books, but the Twilight sweets have a flavour called "forbidden apple" or something to that effect.
#45
Posted 18 May 2009 - 01:19 AM
I don't know about the books, but the Twilight sweets have a flavour called "forbidden apple" or something to that effect.
woah woah woah woah! hold the bloody phone! there's twilight sweets!?!
#46
Posted 18 May 2009 - 01:44 AM
They're little heart shapes made by the American NECCO company. I haven't actually seen them, and I have no idea where they're sold (book stores?), but I have read about them. "Tempting Apple" is the name of the flavour, I believe. Thank goodness for Google!woah woah woah woah! hold the bloody phone! there's twilight sweets!?!
#47
Posted 18 May 2009 - 02:52 AM
#48
Posted 18 May 2009 - 02:37 PM
Actually, apple flavoured chocolates sound delicious.lol i was about to ask why people would make apple flavoured chocolate, then i reread the comments and realised we said sweets, not chocolate it's what i get for being up at 4 in the morning, retarded mistakes
#49
Posted 18 May 2009 - 05:24 PM
Actually, apple flavoured chocolates sound delicious.
what's wrong wit'chu! then again, i'm uber picky with food
#50
Posted 18 May 2009 - 06:20 PM
we're kind of drifting off topic here...
#51
Posted 18 May 2009 - 09:05 PM
I'm picky as well, but I've had cranberry chocolates. After that, any fruit seems good with chocolate!what's wrong wit'chu! then again, i'm uber picky with food
Back on topic (Sorry, Infractus!), does anyone know if there's a relation between this Twilight perfume-
(Kisuke- note the writing on the bottle. )
and this apple perfume-
?
#52
Posted 21 May 2009 - 12:52 AM
- the story is not well redacted
- it gives bad name to werewolves
- vampires are not supposed to "sparkle"
- its totally filled with Mary sues/Gary Stus
I honestly dont get why the book is so popular, so much that its movie is geeting a sequel...
seriously dudes, why do people actually like this kind of...stuff?
#53
Posted 21 May 2009 - 09:30 PM
#54
Posted 23 May 2009 - 12:15 AM
no offense to any of the book fans but I totally hate the book, my reasons:
- the story is not well redacted
- it gives bad name to werewolves
- vampires are not supposed to "sparkle"
- its totally filled with Mary sues/Gary Stus
I honestly dont get why the book is so popular, so much that its movie is geeting a sequel...
seriously dudes, why do people actually like this kind of...stuff?
- Who cares about redacting (is that even a word? ), as long as it sells! *sarcasm*
- It gives a bad name to vampires, too. Honestly, I had to listen to how "Nosferatu" was racist and derrogatory toward vampires and the Cullens are the only sympathetic, accurate representation of vampires ever created, and they're real. Yeah.
- But don't you think that this guy is glittery?
*glitter!*
- Gary Stus? Never heard that term before, but I love it. Anyways, who needs creativity, individuality, and human, sympathetic characters when they're HOT VAMPIRES? *sarcasm again*
Honestly, vampirism was just an exuse to make Edward a Gary Stu, it seems. Dx
- Who reads it? Teenage girls who want to seem "cool" and "emo." Overrated "subculutres" irk me.
#55
Posted 25 May 2009 - 02:41 PM
#56
Posted 27 May 2009 - 04:46 AM
Then a couple of months later I keep hearing about how apparently awesome and life-changing Twilight is. "Holy sh!t, it's gotten hyped," I thought to myself, and I've learned over the years when something has that much hype, the material is either awesome or fail, or the material is pretty good and fun but the fanbase ruins what fun there is for everyone else. After reading pros and cons about it I decided to try and read it.
I have a lot of respect for those of you who were actually able to read the entire first book, much less the whole series. I couldn't get past page 53 because Bella's behavior and attitude DISGUSTED me. All she seemed to do was mentally whine about everything and snub the people who were being nice to her (whatever their reasons). The thing that got me the most was that, of all the kids that were nice to her and helped her out during her first day at a new school, she has the nerve to say that the nicest person she "had met all day" was the only other person who wasn't originally from Forks: the boy from California. Snobbish much, Miss Swan? ><()
It took one of my friends reading the whole series and telling me the story herself to help me sort out the hype, the hate, and the actual material. This friend is an avid reader and has introduced me to all kinds of awesome stories, and she reads very carefully to make sure she understands everything. Thanks to her explaining things to me, I've concluded that SM has two things destroying her here:
1. poor writing (show, not tell, SHOW, NOT TELL! >.< I saw that from page 1)
2. attempting to use science to explain the vampires (And Renesmee, dear god ><()), then not sticking with it
Stalking and the creepy imprinting the Werewolves do among many other things notwithstanding, the Twilight series would have been better if SM had better writing skill (she's improving, from what I've heard) and had just stuck with vampires being completely supernatural beings. I would have been able to accept the sparkling a little better if she had. XD
I may try and read it again when my bile for the books has subsided a bit. For now, I'll stick with Stephen King's Dark Tower series X3
#57
Posted 28 May 2009 - 07:49 PM
It sounds really lame in the hugest of ways. Vampires are cool n'all but not when crossed with some emo teen dramaramma. I bet hot topic had a field day.
#58
Posted 28 May 2009 - 08:40 PM
But Edward is seeeeeeensitive! And cuuuuuute! And he wears makeuuuuuuup! Am I the only one who gets a distinct "Tim Curry but worse" vibe?However, what I don't understand is how so many emo fangirls it has. There is nothing remotely emo about these books. "OMG! It's about vampires! It's totally emo and cool!", is probably what goes through their minds. Personally, I feel that's kinda dumb. But oh well. I guess I should just let the little emos have their fun.
Meyer blinded you with science?2. attempting to use science to explain the vampires (And Renesmee, dear god ><()), then not sticking with it
Buffy the movie or Buffy the series? I heard that the movie has a really ditzy heroine, somewhat like Elvira. That sounds good. The series? Not so much.One of my friends is REAAAALY into this Twilight stuff and the more she goes on about it the more I don't want to see it. She was a huge Buffy fan too... so that sort of gives me the steer well clear impressions.
It sounds really lame in the hugest of ways. Vampires are cool n'all but not when crossed with some emo teen dramaramma. I bet hot topic had a field day.
#59
Posted 04 June 2009 - 03:48 AM
Meyer blinded you with science?
From what I've read, she tried to and failed miserably XD
--She says that vampires have two extra chromosomes, which gives them their hard sparkly skin and powers. If this is true, then scientifically speaking, Reneesme couldn't have been born. An extra copy of chromosome 24 in humans causes Down's Syndrome. Two extra chromosomes with nothing to match up to in a human sex cell wouldn't work and the pregnancy would likely abort before it could really start.
--Meyer also has apparently said that all the fluids in a vampire's body turns into their special venom, which is responsible for changing a human into a vampire and is also how Reneesme was conceived. Perhaps a better choice of words would have worked better. Venom, as definied by Wiktionary is:
A poison wielded by an animal
Poison is, then:
A substance that is harmful or lethal to a living organism; something that harms a person or thing.
Venom, therefore, harms or takes life, not begin it.
Those are the two examples I can think of off the top of my head. Meyer would have been SO much better off if she'd just stuck to the supernatural to describe the vampires. XD
#60
Posted 27 July 2009 - 12:43 AM
#61
Posted 31 July 2009 - 10:58 AM
They sure did... >.>I bet hot topic had a field day.
I went in there with a few friends (I was dragged, more like XD) and we were commenting on how all the Twilight stuff was overpowering the Harry Potter.
Seriously, the two do NOT belong in the same league.
#62
Posted 26 August 2009 - 02:36 AM
This is different from The Godfather, a highly successful bestseller and critically acclaimed book. Like Twilight, The Godfather was written after Mario Puso decided to write a book that the public would enjoy and would roll in the dough.
The Godfather, although written to make money, still holds the concepts of good literature. There's vivid writing, an interesting and understandable plot, and correct use of grammar and linguistics. Romance scenes found in the Godfather are also more descriptive, more thrilling, and make more sense. Characters feel more human, so to speak, with no pun intended. Each character has a complex personality that causes the plot to unfold based on the reactions caused by one another. Michael Corleone is a prime example; many events would not have played out had he been a different man.
With Twilight, Meyers basically took what she thought was cool and what would sell and sold it for some cash. Characters have personal thoughts and feelings, but they're very stereotypical and shallow. There's the smart-yet-innocent, bright-yet-dumb everygirl (Bella), who falls in-love with the older, slightly-neurotic, battle-scarred man (Edward), and the rival gangs, friends, and family try to screw it up for them. Sounds a bit like another very popular romance play, eh? Just with a lot less dirty jokes and lot more modern english.
I remember the actor who played Edward summed up best how I felt about the books: it was like reading Meyers's private romantic thoughts. They don't make sense at all, but they captivate and that's why it sells so well.
My 2 cents anyway.
#63
Posted 27 August 2009 - 02:48 AM
Don't worry, LUCiD. You like NiGHTS- there's nothing wrong with you!I don't like it very much, to be honest. (And now kids at my school think there's something wrong with me for not liking it.)
#64
Posted 27 August 2009 - 09:25 AM
If you love NiGHTS, you'll always find a friend~Don't worry, LUCiD. You like NiGHTS- there's nothing wrong with you!
Ahem. But to stay on topic, I agree- Meyer wrote it to sell. Publishing IS a business, I get that... but isn't it better to write something that you know people will enjoy rather than to just make some money?
#65
Posted 27 August 2009 - 09:39 AM
Well, I was under the impression that a lot of people loved Twilight...Ahem. But to stay on topic, I agree- Meyer wrote it to sell. Publishing IS a business, I get that... but isn't it better to write something that you know people will enjoy rather than to just make some money?
#66
Posted 27 August 2009 - 12:31 PM
Well, as I mentioned above, that's where The Godfather makes a good comparison.Ahem. But to stay on topic, I agree- Meyer wrote it to sell. Publishing IS a business, I get that... but isn't it better to write something that you know people will enjoy rather than to just make some money?
The Godfather is chocked full of violence, romance, crime, mischief, and nearly everything the American Public loved about Crime flicks. And it wasn't by chance that it was written that way; it was purposefully written to please an audience.
However, the Godfather, personally, is of higher quality than Twilight because of correct grammar usage, ideal plot structure, character development, etc.
tl;dr It's not what reason it's written, it's how, in this case.
#67
Posted 27 August 2009 - 07:48 PM
"OMG! YOU LIKE TWILIGHT NOW?!"
#68
Posted 27 August 2009 - 09:16 PM
#69
Posted 28 August 2009 - 04:49 AM
#70
Posted 23 September 2009 - 04:55 AM
-don't die in sunlight
-don't turn into bats
-don't sleep in coffins during the day
-have powers never before related to vampires
-no reference to garlic/silver crosses/wooden stakes or anything
-some actually get along with humans. Imagine that I make a story centered around your most cherished childhood memory, be it the hero from your favorite fairytale or your stuffed bunny Lucy, except now the protagonist KILLS YOU and becomes a MASS MURDERER while running from the cops and it's friends and family trying to help it. Meanwhile, in the real world, everyone thinks it's the greatest thing that's ever happened. In my eyes, it's the same thing.
#71
Posted 23 September 2009 - 02:24 PM
#72
Posted 24 September 2009 - 03:40 AM
Yes. Yes, yes, and yes.I would love to take all of the books stack them on spire and burn them and watch the flames
- Horrible sentence structure
- Mary Sues/Gary Stus
- SPARKLES?! They should smoke, sizzle, something! Burst into quick flames or a slow, painful death. Anything is better than frackin' sparkles.
- Vampires' reputation has plummeted. Where's a good Dracula movie when you need it?
- It makes my eyes burn/bleed and it's boring
- Bella gripes about things she takes for granted and doesn't appreciate it AT ALL (at least not from what I've read)... Kill her already!
- It killed my favorite word.
I found some scanned pages on the 'net. Hated every word that burned into my mind. I was open to giving it a shot and see what everyone gripped about.
I now hate it. BURN! I want it to buuuuurrrrnn.... By Zim, I command it to be so!
*sob* I wanna cry. Now anyone's open to getting a book published. At the very bottom-of-the-barrel least, I know that, with all my time and effort (EFFORT!) in writing and getting a good storyline down with OCs and human characteristics, that I may one day be able to publish a book. (I have spent....a very long time creating the events...still nailing them down to make everything come together.)
A very bad fiction written by an angsty teenager.
Gah! >_< *sobs* Please start the fire...
Edit: My cousin said that there are three paragraphs describing someone's hair. Oh ho ho WHY?! (And please tell me that's not true...)
#73
Posted 24 September 2009 - 08:45 AM
I actually heard that 2 whole pages were used to describe Edward's eyes or something. A friend of mine, during my birthday party a couple years ago, looked up the trailers and interviews for the movie (this was before it was in theaters), and one of the movie staff said that in an interview. Yes. 2 pages. Unless it was an exaggeration. I don't know 'cause I've never read the book. But I watched the movie (because my mom got curious because one of her friends said it was good), and I thought "How the heck does this make sense?" They fell for each other too fast. Mom said "Some people have chemistry." Well, yeah, but isn't that just lust? Overall, it was very unrealistic and over-dramatic. The people didn't feel like real people. I have to laugh a little, though, because I knew Twilight was a fad that would die out in a few years or so, and around where I live, the buzz has already been dying down. A friend of mine has seen the light and is now an ex-Twilight fan. I hear little about the upcoming Twilight movie other than rumors that there's friction between the lead actors. I've seen only one Twilight shirt since the start of the school year. In all, things are going well.Edit: My cousin said that there are three paragraphs describing someone's hair. Oh ho ho WHY?! (And please tell me that's not true...)
#74
Posted 25 September 2009 - 12:29 AM
Speaking of Bela, let's track the history of movie vampires:
Notice how they've gradually become younger and better looking. In order from top to bottom we have:
1. Max Schrek as Count Orlok (Nosfteratu, 1922)
2. Bela Lugosi as Count Dracula (Dracula, 1931)
3. Christopher Lee as Count Dracula (Dracula: Prince of Darkness, 1966)
4. Robert Pattinson as Edward Cullen (Twilight, 2008)
Also, it seems like vampirism is no longer exclusive to nobility.
#75
Posted 25 September 2009 - 11:41 AM
#76
Posted 02 October 2009 - 10:03 PM
#77
Posted 03 October 2009 - 01:25 AM
Needless to say, I've been traumatized.
#78
Posted 03 October 2009 - 01:51 AM
#79
Posted 03 October 2009 - 02:03 AM
#80
Posted 04 October 2009 - 02:51 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users