Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Sega porting Dreamcast library to PS3/360
#1
Posted 11 June 2010 - 12:14 AM
Okay, so now they're porting Dreamcast games to PS3/360. This is great great GREAT news! I WANT SEAMAN BLARGHKAHKSHFYRHAGHGH!
Alright, enough out of me. This looks like Sega's doing what it does best and is hedging it's bets with porting old sold games to a new system. I can get behind this. HOWEVER, if they're able to do this, they damn well are able to port NiD original or PS2 remake over onto the same platforms.
I'm excited to see what other games they pick. Maybe we'll get lucky...?
#2
Posted 11 June 2010 - 12:20 AM
Saturn games must really be that difficult to emulate, as it's now practically the only console not to be ported anywhere else. Now even the Dreamcast is a go for downloadable. The PS2 NiD certainly must be portable to the PS3 at least; someone needs a slap in the head somewhere to get it done.
#3
Posted 11 June 2010 - 04:10 AM
I heard the Saturn games are ridiculously hard to port because of how the system hardware rendered the graphics of it's games.
#4
Posted 11 June 2010 - 12:02 PM
I would most like to see Ecco: Defender of the Future. And of non-Sega games, Power Stone 2.
I've also heard that Saturn is very difficult to emulate. But NiGHTS on Live Arcade would be THE BEST! Especially if it had fancy HD graphics...
#5
Posted 14 June 2010 - 02:48 AM
#6
Posted 22 June 2010 - 10:39 PM
#7
Posted 22 June 2010 - 10:54 PM
#8
Posted 14 September 2010 - 10:58 PM
Ulp.
http://xboxlive.ign..../1120409p1.html
#9
Posted 15 September 2010 - 02:06 PM
#10
Posted 15 September 2010 - 09:31 PM
#11
Posted 16 September 2010 - 12:02 AM
What are the differences between the Dreamcast and PC Versions? Is the Dreamcast itself too hard to port?
Well, PC games seem to port easily over to the Xbox 360. So, for the most part, any Dreamcast games that were on the PC will probably be ported with a few changes to make it seem like the Dreamcast version, Like the Sonic Adventure Port. With that, they changed the title screen, and anything with the DX logo in it to the Dreamcast version, and with a few other things, such as a consistent 60 fps, draw distance, leaderboards, etc. So I wouldn't be surprised if all the "Dreamcast" Ports are PC ports.
#12
Posted 16 September 2010 - 12:15 AM
I should replay my copy of SA for Dreamcast. I've been meaning to play it again for years... I remember loving it though.
At least Crazy Taxi still holds up by modern gameplay standards IMO.
#13
Posted 16 September 2010 - 02:43 AM
Here are some point of facts:
1) The original Sonic Adventure was ahead of its time in terms of graphics. The visuals were astounding, but unfortunately they haven't aged well. Sega has not changed these one bit from their "original" versions, including not bothering to add a widescreen display. Without widescreen the game doesn't even qualify for current HD resolutions.
2) Original here more-than-likely indicates the PC port. Should have seemed suspicious to me then but it didn't, that they picked the two dreamcast games with highest profile PC ports. PC port -> 360 port is an extremely easy conversion, considering that the dev kit for 360 XBL games runs on Windows from what I have heard. This should have made it EVEN EASIER to add new features and improvements to the game, not to mention...
3) The PC port was the DX version. Sega ripped the DX part out of the initial release and are charing to have it, calling it the DX DLC....really, Sega? This is basically the epitome of nickel-and-diming the nostalgia out of gamers. No wonder the reviewers are all spiteful: they had such respect for the company back when the game came out, and had their hopes rekindled by a re-released on current systems, only to have it crushed by a lazy port job and a nickel-and-diming scheme to get the entire purchase. Not to mention...
4) The Dreamcast version, gamecube version, and the PC port are still pretty widely available. Unlike Saturn games, Dreamcasts are still easily found and the PC port can be played on any modern PC. The gamecube version plays on Gamecube and Wii, where an HD remake isn't feasible. So this digital no-frills release doesn't even take advantage of the platform besides the digital distribution, thereby cutting out the cost of manufacturing physical discs.
5) Look at the decline in game scores over the years. The original game scored fairly well when it came out, because it came out ahead of its time. The Gamecube and PC ports added small things and was essentially the same game, and didn't get as good reviewed because it was getting stale amongst much more fierce competition. Now, besides the retro value, the game doesn't hold a candle in its current state. It is definitively lacking in what current appeal is and, to be completely honest, what is expected from re-releases on PSN/XBL these days.
I mean, FFS, the Super Puzzle Fighter 2 Turbo rerelease had all the bonus features from the "X for Matchmaking Service" version that came out on Dreamcast years ago, and the visuals look ridiculous because they cleaned up. The netcode is nice on that as well, allowing for advantage to be taken of the matchmaking services on the game networks.
I'm not trying to crush anyone's nostalgia trip but I don't think it's worth the investment for this port. I need to delve deeper into it 1st person tomorrow, so I will post more thoughts then. In the mean time, color me a disillusioned gamer.
#14
Posted 16 September 2010 - 09:19 AM
If anyone was expecting more to be added to this port, you're expecting WAY too much out of SEGA.
Still, considering what I've seen and read, it's great that there's a PC version of NiGHTS and Microsoft requires all XBLA games to have leader boards...
#15
Posted 16 September 2010 - 02:16 PM
If anyone was expecting more to be added to this port, you're expecting WAY too much out of SEGA.
Still, considering what I've seen and read, it's great that there's a PC version of NiGHTS and Microsoft requires all XBLA games to have leader boards...
From what I've seen from Sega lately, there have been many instances where it's like night and day on decisions regarding a single game. It's almost like a two headed ogre where one makes a good choice and the other makes a bad. Then the proceed to argue who's breath stinks more and why they have trouble with girls, but I digress. Example: Sonic Unleashed - daytime levels were apparently great, nighttime levels needless filler.
I'll argue the same deal with the port of Sonic Adventure: great to bring a game that came out on the cutting edge of "future gaming" (basically the jump from 1st-gen rough 3d visuals and gameplay to 2nd-gen, where it was more refined and much better looking) into the modern market. It has nostalgia value and is an example of a 3d Sonic game that is, at the very least, better on-average than what's been out for the last 4 years (ignoring the Sonic games on GBA and DS, which were awesome and not 3d). However, they didn't treat it with the same love that they did back then. Is it wrong to expect a little consistency from a game company? I guess not.
Also, that PC version of NiGHTS, while still under speculation, was more-than-likely the net-distributed version emulated on a Sega-modified version of GiriGiri:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GiriGiri
I'm intrigued to see what, if any, other games Sega plans to bring out after Sonic Adventure/Crazy Taxi. Like I said, those are both Dreamcast games that had PC ports. Just for fun, I found a list of Sega PC games and narrowed down the list to show all games from the Saturn/Dreamcast era that had native PC ports. List is below (source is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sega_PC):
* Baku Baku Animal
* Bug!
* Bug Too!
* Crazy Taxi
* Daytona USA: Championship Circuit Edition
* Daytona USA Deluxe
* Enemy Zero (4CD)
* Hundred Swords
* Last Bronx
* Manx TT SuperBike
* NBA Action 98
* Panzer Dragoon
* Sega Bass Fishing
* Virtua Tennis
* Sega GT
* Sega Marine Fishing
* Sega Rally (CD)
* Sega Rally 2 (CD)
* Sega Touring Car Championship
* Sega Worldwide Soccer
* Sky Target
* Sonic 3D Blast
* Sonic Adventure DX: Director's Cut (2CD)
* Sonic R (CD)
* The House of the Dead (CD)
* The House of the Dead 2 (CD)
* The Typing of the Dead (CD)
* Virtua Fighter (CD)
* Virtua Fighter 2 (CD)
* Virtua Cop (CD)
* Virtua Cop 2 (CD)
* Virtual On
If they choose more that are on this list, we have much more reason to suspect that they're just doing ports of the PC versions.
#16
Posted 16 September 2010 - 02:26 PM
#17
Posted 16 September 2010 - 02:40 PM
I saw the trailer for Crazy Taxi last night. It sported the new soundtrack but the song they put on the trailer was very forgettable song. Every time I try to remember what the new song sounded like I can only hear "YEAH YEAH YEAH YEAH YEAH!" I can get used to it but it's certainly not great. By the way, I read somewhere that Crazy Taxi's PC version had new songs so I wonder if they're just using those songs from the PC port.
Can you link me to the trailer you saw? I have the PC version so I'll be able to check and compare.
Funny story about the PC version: the music was simply a few MP3s all generically titled. You could put your own MP3s in the music directory, rename them to replace the ones already in there, and BOOM! Custom racing music.
#18
Posted 16 September 2010 - 02:49 PM
I just found it at SEGA's Japanese YouTube page.Can you link me to the trailer you saw? I have the PC version so I'll be able to check and compare.
Funny story about the PC version: the music was simply a few MP3s all generically titled. You could put your own MP3s in the music directory, rename them to replace the ones already in there, and BOOM! Custom racing music.
#19
Posted 17 September 2010 - 02:16 AM
I know it probably won't happen, but I can dream, can't I?
#20
Posted 17 September 2010 - 10:10 AM
#21
Posted 17 September 2010 - 01:24 PM
"This Sonic Adventure is somewhat based on the enhanced GameCube and PC port, Sonic Adventure DX. That version featured higher resolutions, slightly improved character models, and some other bonus minigames, but here, the "DX" has been stripped from the title, and you get only the superficial additions to the game...except the PC version's resolutions: This only runs in a 4:3 window that can't be stretched at all. "
I think that explains it all quite clearly.
Also, iLLViLLAiN, I think that song was just overlaid on the video because I never once heard any of the games SFX. I think even in demo replays, you could hear the car wheels screeching. I'll install my PC version sometime over the weekend to double-check, however that song in the video was neither in the Dreamcast version nor the PC version.
#22
Posted 17 September 2010 - 05:40 PM
I couldn't leave it to ambiguity, so I went and researched some screenshots of the PC version vs the recently released XBLA release. My findings were pretty shocking...
Check this Neogaf post for some screenies of Sonic Adventure DX running on an average PC, customized to run at the PC equivalent of 720p (1280x720)
http://www.neogaf.co...p;postcount=131
Here's the one we'll use for comparison, since I found somewhat close to it online for XBLA as well:
Sonic Adventure DX on PC (720p)
Note that, by default, the PC version can't run in widescreen. However, there's a configuration utility you can find that allows for custom resolutions, so the PC version is technically capable of widescreen and HD resolutions. And for supernerds, notice the crisp clarity of the textures both near and far, as well as how far along you can see (the draw distance is quite good here).
Now here we have the recent XBLA port, which is supposedly based on the PC port, which itself was also based on the Gamecube port. Note that this is running boxed in (not widescreen) and at an internal resolution of 640x480 (known as 480p, not an HD resolution):
Blur-tastic. Look how fuzzy it is compared to the other one! And the perspective is incredibly narrow compared to the widescreen one. If you look at the bridge, you see it start on one side of the tree but on the other side it just disappears, showing a much shorter draw distance.
...
So it's worse than just a slapdash port job: they literally put out ZERO EFFORT to put this thing on the 360.
/me eats own beard.
Edit: I know a lot of people still enjoy this game for nostalgic reasons, and I don't fault them. I am simply flabergasted with the absolute laziness shown in how Sega is treating a port of one of its beloved properties. From back when Sonic still had considerable credit for being edgy, and this treatment is supposed to instill faith in how they're doing things these days. *sigh*
#23
Posted 18 September 2010 - 12:10 AM
DX is very shiny. I don't really know why...I wasn't even aware there was a PC version. The screenshots look pretty different from I remember, it looks much shinier?
I should replay my copy of SA for Dreamcast. I've been meaning to play it again for years... I remember loving it though.
At least Crazy Taxi still holds up by modern gameplay standards IMO.
Do ports ever update graphics?1) The original Sonic Adventure was ahead of its time in terms of graphics. The visuals were astounding, but unfortunately they haven't aged well. Sega has not changed these one bit from their "original" versions, including not bothering to add a widescreen display. Without widescreen the game doesn't even qualify for current HD resolutions.
Good old Sega.3) The PC port was the DX version. Sega ripped the DX part out of the initial release and are charing to have it, calling it the DX DLC....really, Sega? This is basically the epitome of nickel-and-diming the nostalgia out of gamers. No wonder the reviewers are all spiteful: they had such respect for the company back when the game came out, and had their hopes rekindled by a re-released on current systems, only to have it crushed by a lazy port job and a nickel-and-diming scheme to get the entire purchase. Not to mention...
That's why Sega marketed it as a port, not a remake. Ports exsist mainly for retro value for those who didn't get it the first time aroung. Had Sega marketed it as a remake/new game then done nothing, there would be grounds for anger. It's the same game; the score shouldn't even be considered for change.5) Look at the decline in game scores over the years. The original game scored fairly well when it came out, because it came out ahead of its time. The Gamecube and PC ports added small things and was essentially the same game, and didn't get as good reviewed because it was getting stale amongst much more fierce competition. Now, besides the retro value, the game doesn't hold a candle in its current state. It is definitively lacking in what current appeal is and, to be completely honest, what is expected from re-releases on PSN/XBL these days.
#24
Posted 18 September 2010 - 02:31 AM
If memory serves, the downloads for Dreamcast were basically sponsored contest time-attack things. I remember it being mostly adding ads for Nokia phones and letting you compare times for finishing a little level. I don't think you're missing much.
Yeah, I know that, but wasn't there some other downloads, like some extra tracks for Twinkle Circuit, some holiday changes in certain levels, some special Chao, etc.?
#25
Posted 18 September 2010 - 06:06 PM
I don't know about the original Sonic Adventure (Twinkle Circut tracks sounds about right), but SA2 had holliday themes for 2 player mode, with Santa suits and Halloween costumes.Yeah, I know that, but wasn't there some other downloads, like some extra tracks for Twinkle Circuit, some holiday changes in certain levels, some special Chao, etc.?
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users