Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Sonic the Hedgehog
#1
Posted 01 September 2008 - 10:07 PM
With my experience in Sonic fandom, there seems to be a polarizing effect on fans- Either you love the newer games or hate them. Despite this, I tried to cover all the camps and add an "Other" option, just in case. This is quite a touchy subject with some folks, so lets not start flame wars, just mature debates. Remember- opinions are different from facts, and this is about opinions. Let's try not have anyone banned, shall we?
My opinion is that, since Sonic Adventure 2 (Which I used, along with Sonic Heroes as a landmark due to the fact that one was created for Sega systems and one wasn't), the series has added WAY too many chacters. Knuckles started out as Sonic's rival, then Shadow, then Jet (Who seems pretty confined to the Riders games), then Silver...and Knuxie ended up Sonic's friend. This, along with Shadow's miraculous reincarnation in each game gets old fast.
Your thoughts?
#2
Posted 02 September 2008 - 01:17 AM
#3
Posted 02 September 2008 - 03:08 AM
Sonic can always be saved, Sega just needs to get the right guys for the job. Sonic Unleashed might be this.
#4
Posted 02 September 2008 - 07:40 AM
Sonic is on a one way ticket train down the toilet!
it was good but I don't know what Sega/ Sonic Team is thinking with these sequels... and quite frankly I don't wanna know...
#5
Posted 02 September 2008 - 10:13 AM
Sonic Heroes was even worse. Sonic Riders was okay but not a real Sonic game. I haven't played anything newer as I don't have a current-generation console.
However I actually DID enjoy Shadow the Hedgehog. Even though the game was hyped a lot for being "edgy" and "badass" (and panned by critics/fans for that reason), I thought it was a solid experience. I very rarely fell off of the level, which is good. Also the gun did make for interesting gameplay and the "dark" storyline contrasted well with the typical Sonic things.
I also very much loved Sonic Rush. I don't have Sonic Rush Adventure but I've heard it is about equal in quality? The Sonic Advance games were also fairly nifty. When Sonic is on a handheld platform, they seem to be able to do it right.
I have high hopes for Sonic Chronicles.
#6
Posted 02 September 2008 - 08:17 PM
#7
Posted 02 September 2008 - 08:38 PM
I honestly stopped having fun with Sonic Adventure 2. That game frustrated me in some parts in which I would fall off a level or else spend WAY too long failing to find the pieces of the master emerald as Knuckles/Rouge (I remember royally sucking at the asteroid level).
Sonic Heroes was even worse. Sonic Riders was okay but not a real Sonic game. I haven't played anything newer as I don't have a current-generation console.
However I actually DID enjoy Shadow the Hedgehog. Even though the game was hyped a lot for being "edgy" and "badass" (and panned by critics/fans for that reason), I thought it was a solid experience. I very rarely fell off of the level, which is good. Also the gun did make for interesting gameplay and the "dark" storyline contrasted well with the typical Sonic things.
I also very much loved Sonic Rush. I don't have Sonic Rush Adventure but I've heard it is about equal in quality? The Sonic Advance games were also fairly nifty. When Sonic is on a handheld platform, they seem to be able to do it right.
I have high hopes for Sonic Chronicles.
Rouge is my favorite Sonic character ever, so I tolerated my gazillion tries on Mad Space. She's the only one I have all A's as.
Sonic Heroes was fine, but Cream's voice is EVIL! And Frog Forest's magical disappearing floors (that game needed better programers) is cruel and unusual punishment. Rouge looked like a Power Ranger, but I digress...
Shadow grated on my nerves. The concept was cool, but couldn't thay have used someone other than a gun-toting angsthog? If it was annother character from another series, I probably would have liked it more. The fact that he said, like, three diffrent phrases (I disliked his overusage of swears.), and the fact that everyone swore along with him bugged me. When I rented the game, my mom thought that I got something rated "M".
MARIA!
#8
Posted 03 September 2008 - 12:49 AM
#9
Posted 03 September 2008 - 05:01 PM
#10
Posted 03 September 2008 - 05:17 PM
I've always hated the two being separate stories, but at the same time I loved it because it gave different view points to how things unfolded. But after Sonic Adventure 1 came out, they started to bleed those characters into the comics, and much as Nocturne said, nothing is making any sense anymore with all these characters.
I can't say any of the news games have intrigued me - in fact I gave up playing when the Wii released and that whole... what was it called? Ring of something another? I still refuse to play Shadow the Hedgehog - I mean, really, it's not hard to picture Shadow with a gun - any idiot could use one, but watermelons?! >_<
but yea...slowly, I'm giving up on the sonic games until something gives me hope to the slowly spiraling downhill game...
#11
Posted 05 September 2008 - 10:54 PM
I still refuse to play Shadow the Hedgehog - I mean, really, it's not hard to picture Shadow with a gun - any idiot could use one, but watermelons?! >_<
Watermelons? The game has none. However there were jokes about how Shadow is the "Black" Sonic and how he would collect "bling" and "watermelons" (in order to fit with racist stereotypes). These are not to be taken seriously however!
#12
Posted 06 September 2008 - 01:55 AM
There's been topics like this before I think but oh well I'll still post in this one. For me Sonic games have gone from incredibly fun to just some parts fun, some parts not fun. I think the biggest thing about the earlier Sonics is that they were cutscene and voice acting free. I'm not sure of anyone else but I have a deep appreciation for fast paced games with little to no voice acting or cutscenes. For example NiD. Anyway, Sonic games on the Genesis were more faced past because nothing ever broke from the speed except for the screen when you beat an act and those were acceptable. When cutscenes were added it kinda broke away from the action and the series started to become too focused on a story. Even worse the stories became much too series or at least the way they played out became too serious. I think this happened around the time when Sonic X started coming on 4kids not to blame 4kids. It's just the time things seemed to try to go for a more mature story... with cartoon characters. That can work in comics but the games were never too heavy on story as much as they were about speed. Hell I didn't even know Sonic 1 had a story until several years after I played it and looked to see if it had one and because it was so basic it was ignored which may have been for the best.
Also, another thing that ruined things for me were actually in one of my favorite Sonic games. I never liked having to play other characters in Sonic games. Shadow was fine since his levels were still fast paced but treasure hunting and robot fights just weren't my thing. At least in Sonic the Hedgehog 2 when you chose Tails it was all still in the same story and the game was still fast.
Wow that was long.
#13
Posted 06 September 2008 - 06:26 AM
Watermelons? The game has none. However there were jokes about how Shadow is the "Black" Sonic and how he would collect "bling" and "watermelons" (in order to fit with racist stereotypes). These are not to be taken seriously however!
I just know what I've heard. Either way, I've been skeptical about it since it came out. But thank you for clearing that up for me. @@'
^^ Sounds like something straight out of 4chan lol
You lost the game. >> << -skitters-
#14
Posted 06 September 2008 - 07:04 PM
SA2 was the pinnacle of sonic, it was great, it was perfect, and i believe one of the best DC/GCN games ever. After that, it kinda went poof. Sonic heroes came out, i love it, i played the ps2 version, which was fun, but i own the pc and it is AMAZING, but not as good as SA2 . Everything after that went boom, until Sonic Riders and Zero G. AWESOME games, but, not quite sonic.......I just bought Sonic and the Secret Rings. It's a good game, i like it more than SH, but still not as much as SA2. Iv'e played the other sonic game released since SA2, but these were the only ones that showed any hope for SEGA. I believe they can do it, and they 'have' made good games, but it's almost random with SEGA if the game itself is gonna be good or not. Im looking forward to Dark Knight as opposed to Unleashed nowadays, YAY FOR SONIC AND SWORDS!!!!
#15
Posted 07 September 2008 - 09:16 PM
I chose other, so i gotta comment now
SA2 was the pinnacle of sonic, it was great, it was perfect, and i believe one of the best DC/GCN games ever. After that, it kinda went poof. Sonic heroes came out, i love it, i played the ps2 version, which was fun, but i own the pc and it is AMAZING, but not as good as SA2 . Everything after that went boom, until Sonic Riders and Zero G. AWESOME games, but, not quite sonic.......I just bought Sonic and the Secret Rings. It's a good game, i like it more than SH, but still not as much as SA2. Iv'e played the other sonic game released since SA2, but these were the only ones that showed any hope for SEGA. I believe they can do it, and they 'have' made good games, but it's almost random with SEGA if the game itself is gonna be good or not. Im looking forward to Dark Knight as opposed to Unleashed nowadays, YAY FOR SONIC AND SWORDS!!!!
Black knight looks decent, but not all that great. As for Unleashed, that will DESTROY the Mario franchise. Especially that disppoining E3 thing that they had, with Captain Rainbow (you may hurl if you wish) and what-not. Sonic has his chances of being saved, and I think that SEGA just took it. GO SEGA!!!
#16
Posted 07 September 2008 - 09:20 PM
Personally, I have been a Sonic fan all my life. I get sick of the bashers out there all the time. I'm glad to see that people still believe that Sonic can "redeem himself", if he ever needed redeeming... In my opinion, I think videogames have gone in a direction where people must be immediately caught or they despise the game. Whatever happened to playing games for fun, with no purpose except to try to have a great time, no matter how crappy the game was? I mean, videogames are in the "Entertainment" category...
#17
Posted 07 September 2008 - 09:47 PM
#18
Posted 08 September 2008 - 03:14 AM
Whatever happened to playing games for fun, with no purpose except to try to have a great time, no matter how crappy the game was? I mean, videogames are in the "Entertainment" category...
You should never have to make a conscious effort to have fun when playing video games. A game with slow parts is one thing, but why bother playing a game that immediately displeases you the moment you push start? That's why I never finished that abomination known as Sonic 2006.
#19
Posted 12 September 2008 - 01:20 AM
And although the Sonic Advance titles and such have been a much more reliable series (albeit with too many of those grind rails, IMO, and accessing the special stages in SA2 is waay too time consuming trying to find those damn rings, but I digress), Sonic's console career is still in the toilet as we all know. Needs fix.
#20
Posted 12 September 2008 - 06:28 AM
Rouge is my favorite Sonic character ever, so I tolerated my gazillion tries on Mad Space. She's the only one I have all A's as.
Sonic Heroes was fine, but Cream's voice is EVIL! And Frog Forest's magical disappearing floors (that game needed better programers) is cruel and unusual punishment. Rouge looked like a Power Ranger, but I digress...
Shadow grated on my nerves. The concept was cool, but couldn't thay have used someone other than a gun-toting angsthog? If it was annother character from another series, I probably would have liked it more. The fact that he said, like, three diffrent phrases (I disliked his overusage of swears.), and the fact that everyone swore along with him bugged me. When I rented the game, my mom thought that I got something rated "M".
MARIA!
Yes, I quite like Rouge. And her alternate SA2 outfit is pretty damn hot. I personally hate her new voice though. Guhh.
I also thought Sonic Heroes was okay, just a whole different mechanic of gameplay, with a dash more cheesy (..the power of TEAMWORK D: ) but not a bad game. I really liked the last boss music too. And I think Cream's voice went up a few keys in Shadow, which made me fall down.
I didn't buy any of the games after Shadow, and Shadow I bought mostly on principle. I thought, surely it can't be as bad as all that... maybe I'll like it anyway. And well. It was okay. But on the other hand I didn't buy any of the games that came after it... so uh. Well.
Didn't help that I REALLY disagree with some of the new voice talent.
But that's a side issue.
#21
Posted 13 September 2008 - 05:48 PM
Was I the only one who was saying "idk... this game looks more like an epic fail to me..."
#22
Posted 14 September 2008 - 01:13 AM
New Sonic games could still be good, they just need to give them the development time necessary to fulfill their potential and stop rushing them out the door.
#23
Posted 14 September 2008 - 02:22 AM
However I actually DID enjoy Shadow the Hedgehog. Even though the game was hyped a lot for being "edgy" and "badass" (and panned by critics/fans for that reason), I thought it was a solid experience. I very rarely fell off of the level, which is good.
O_o ...seriously?
We have had completely opposite experiences then. Every time I attacked an enemy that was near a cliff of doom with a homing attack, you can damn bet your ass I'd be falling down that cliff in the next 5 seconds. I do rapidfire homing attacks (instilled by Sonic Adventure 2, with those bouncing...upgrades...whatever they were called) and the game would lose track of my homing attack target and I'd end up going over them instead of at them. So, in summation: I was too good and it led to my demise.
I also vividly remember getting several headaches from the grenade launchers, ect. because they were the only ranged weapon that didn't have auto-target, so you were forced to manually target things in the distance which was pretty much impossible because moving just 1 degree clockwise would move the target 90 degrees clockwise 50 yards away. Or you could get all up in the grill of your enemies, and end up having your own grenade launcher injure yourself as well as the opposing force. Also, WTF is with usage limits on SWORDS? I remember finding a katana and being like "f*** YEAH KATANA!" and killing three guys and being "...where the hell did the katana go"
I'd have to say it was the worst gaming experience of my life. >_>
#24
Posted 14 September 2008 - 11:14 AM
#25
Posted 14 September 2008 - 02:46 PM
But I don't think I fell of levels more than 5 times or so and they all felt "valid" unlike Sonic Heroes when it's just "oops you didn't see the curve coming so you somehow end up off the level"! Also the homing attack worked a lot better for me than it did in Sonic Adventure 2 (where I would often jump from enemy to enemy before circling around one several times without hitting it and fall to my death).
It's odd that we would have such different experiences with it though!
#26
Posted 14 September 2008 - 03:00 PM
#27
Posted 22 September 2008 - 07:24 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users