Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Twilight: Love it or Hate it?
#1
Posted 15 July 2008 - 01:20 AM
#2
Posted 15 July 2008 - 07:05 PM
"Teen angst and romance!" Ugh, no thanks.
"Teen angst and romance with vampires and werewolves!" Hey, vampires and werewolves. Maybe there'll be some violence because of that...*reads* ...or not.
But yet, plenty of my friends just love it. Even one who was scared of vampire stories and was totally convinced at one point that I was a vampire thinks it's the best series ever. It's brainwashed them!
#3
Posted 15 July 2008 - 11:24 PM
It was poorly written, it's development of characters is horrible, the characters are horrible, for a romance novel- the lovers have little to no chemistry. Seriously. "You're pretty, can I marry you?" I can go on.
And (to save those who are intending to read it but haven't):
Also, to the authors defense, people blame the fact that she's LDS (Mormon) for there being no violence or sex, but I think because it's a book aimed at pre-teens.
#4
Posted 15 July 2008 - 11:49 PM
mrrphmm huufnmg rldks mph hsphm thielakdn ahakphafmn MAHTMR MMNOMFK!!!!! RRRRRRMMMMM!!! M shhmmml dkaih akdmm phorm, hrmrns mrs YMGH.
Translation:
I haven't read it yet, but all I hear about it is that it's another ROMANCE NOVEL!!!!!! RAAAHHH!!! Though it's a vampire book, romance is YURGH.
#5
Posted 16 July 2008 - 11:39 AM
#6
Posted 16 July 2008 - 03:00 PM
#7
Posted 16 July 2008 - 05:11 PM
Especially Jacob. In the last book she was leading him on. And then turned right around and was all over Edward. Ugh.Not to mention how she keeps treating anyone that's not Edward...
If I wrote crap like this I'd get blacklisted all across the Internet and at school. And yet Meyer does it and becomes a New York Times bestseller. The irony drives me crazy.
I haven't even read her new book, "The Host." I read the dust jacket and was like "what the crap, this is Animorphs without the animal morphing and Twilight without vampires and werewolves."
#8
Posted 16 July 2008 - 09:10 PM
I was at the airport waiting to pick up my aunt when I saw "The Host" and that was exactly what me and my boo thought. "Animorphs without animal morphing."I haven't even read her new book, "The Host." I read the dust jacket and was like "what the crap, this is Animorphs without the animal morphing and Twilight without vampires and werewolves."
#9
Posted 17 July 2008 - 12:59 AM
#10
Posted 18 July 2008 - 03:45 PM
#11
Posted 28 November 2008 - 12:32 AM
#12
Posted 28 November 2008 - 04:01 AM
I know it's suppose to be 1st person and all, but there's a point where "Edward so pertttyyy" is a little... too much.
#13
Posted 28 November 2008 - 11:39 PM
#14
Posted 29 November 2008 - 12:44 PM
One of my coworkers is really into it though?
#15
Posted 29 November 2008 - 02:56 PM
too many squealing fangirls that wouldn't know Edmond Dantes from Dante's Divine Comedy read it, which doesn't help its case.
and my friend who says she is a vampire (believe her if you want- i do) is very miffed about it, saying it's not an accurate representation.
then again, isn't most of it off.
so, it goes in the "i'd rather not" catagory.
#16
Posted 29 November 2008 - 04:56 PM
yep.saying it's not an accurate representation.
I always pull the "And the vampires sparkle in the suuunnn 8D!" gesture with my hands, and Twilightfans turn and say "Did you read the book O_O?"
I didn't, BUT:
- Crosses DON'T cause them to buuurn
- They GLITTER in the sun. GLITTER.
- Edward lacks fangs
- Edward has the mindset of a teenager, when he's much much older.
List goes on~
#17
Posted 30 November 2008 - 01:10 AM
#18
Posted 01 December 2008 - 11:51 AM
There's also quite a hype-backlash going on.
#19
Posted 09 December 2008 - 03:38 AM
The biggest thing for me (and some others) is how Bella basically has NO LIFE outside of Edward - when he disappears in the second book she's depressed to the point of complementing suicide. No one and nothing else matters to her. Oh, and there's the implication that it's okay for a guy to stalk you and watch you in your sleep without you knowing as long as he luuuuuves you and is handsome.
There's also quite a hype-backlash going on.
I couldn't agree with you more. That franchise was built on idiocy. Hopefully, those drunks will sober up, and realize how pathetic the books really are. Why my mom reads it, I'll never understand.
#20
Posted 09 December 2008 - 01:58 PM
And don't bash fanfiction, if you look hard you can find some good, plot driven stuff. Just stay away from things with OCs and you'll be fine.
#21
Posted 10 December 2008 - 04:05 AM
And don't bash fanfiction, if you look hard you can find some good, plot driven stuff. Just stay away from things with OCs and you'll be fine.
If we made exceptions to all of our generalizations, we would never get to our point, except in some cases, where the entire point is to point out the exceptions, which, by the way, are exceptions in themselves, but might be not exceptions at all but rather bizarre normalities, because nothing in the world can be generalized except for the fact that generalizations always have exceptions.
#22
Posted 10 December 2008 - 01:51 PM
Twilght is not something I'm gaga over, but I do enjoy it a great deal. I wouldn't write Fanfiction for it, but I wil re-read it until its pages fall out.
Tales of Symphonia, on the other hand......
#23
Posted 11 December 2008 - 12:51 AM
Hm, I understood that.
Yeah. Right.
#24
Posted 11 December 2008 - 08:19 AM
Vampires, "forbidden" Romance, and pretty boys...
All of these factors are vastly overused and now they fall under the same roof...
In short I'm glad I didn't make the mistake of watching it.
thx
#25
Posted 11 December 2008 - 06:35 PM
That's a bit biased, since I've been known to watch Naruto, and The Nightmare Before Christmas is pretty nifty... but. I think most of you could understand and sympathise that point.
I'll probably watch the movie when it ends up on our local channel 4 one weekend when we're bored out of our skulls at work.
Also, might I add, please refrain from turning this into a bloody battle ground. Keep your snarky remarks to yourself, kthx.
#26
Posted 12 December 2008 - 08:19 AM
There's so many movies nowadays that there doesn't seem to be many "good" films, imo...
I just watched my Digimon the Movie VHS tape because I was bored and needed to work out to something...
and found that it's still allot better than today's movies!
...huh... can't beat the classics
#27
Posted 12 December 2008 - 01:51 PM
Besides, the make up for the movie looks very bad- and I don't like the actors for Carisle, James, or Jasper. I would go into why, but I don't honestly think any of you care.
#28
Posted 30 December 2008 - 06:06 AM
Let me start by saying I have not read the books or seen the movie, nor do I plan to at the moment. I'm a bit of a horror nut (Honestly, I find "Suspiria" hilarious and I quote the Crypt Keeper. Am I evil?) and I have a weakness for vampires (some think I am one, lol) so everyone says "OMG read twilight! Edward's so cuuuuuuuute! Bella's my role modelll!!!!! oh, yeah, it has vampires..."
But from what I've read, vampirism seems to be the excuse to a.) grab the horror crowd, and B.) have an excuse to make Edward perfect. Is this really the case? I'm pondering reading the books to at least understand one of my friends, who obsesses over Twilight Role play, so is it worth reading? Will I be disappointed (I'm already pretty sure that Meyer is no Bram Stoker) or pleasantly surprised (sparkly, fangless vampired might be irrelevent)
Plus the movie...is Edward described as looking like a girl in the books? No disrespect to Rober Pattinson or whatever, but in twilight he looks...womanly. The other characters look odd too, but perhaps nowadays vapires have poofy hair rather than fangs.
So help me, forumers, is it worth desperatly seeking
#29
Posted 30 December 2008 - 02:49 PM
#30
Posted 30 December 2008 - 10:34 PM
Hmm, I got my hands of a copy of this in Chemistry class one day. Didn't really read it, just skimmed, but you can literally turn to any page in the book and find something to laugh at. Actually, one of the chapters even begins with a run on sentence, if memory serves me well.
Oh my god post some of the "highlights." Being head of the grammar police, I need something (famous) to mock.
#31
Posted 31 December 2008 - 09:27 PM
I really don't see how anyone even somewhat literary minded can like it because it's so badly written.
#32
Posted 01 January 2009 - 12:03 AM
#33
Posted 02 January 2009 - 04:26 PM
I wanted to see just how bad these books were, after hearing many rumors, so rather than spend days reading the book, I went to the movie theater and watched the movie.
I have to say it was one of the worst movies I've ever seen (and I've seen a heckuva lot of movies - my mom owned two movie stores when I was a kid). Here we go:
- How exactly do these two characters fall in love? Through brief, awkward, stilted conversations? Stalking? A strong desire to eat one another? Is it cause he randomly saves her life with his uberpowers? They still don't know each other, really. Maybe the book had more to it, but it seems like they just fall in love (or suddenly feel rather murderous/hungry) at first glance (or smell), which is ludicrous. That's not love, that's lust (or hunger).
- Edward is flippin' crazy. No, really. Pattinson said that he didn't really like the books (he felt like he was intruding on a mad woman's personal fantasies when he read it) and felt that Edward was manic-depressive, so that is how he played the him in the movie. Maybe it's just me, but this made his entire performance just that much more erratic, stilted, and awkward. I also don't quite get that sense of him being formal/retaining oldworld charms from the movie. I hope it's more apparent in the books.
- The minor background characters are more interesting and likeable than Edward and Bella combined. I liked Jasper a lot. The way he stared in horror at everything - very funny. The vampire Mommy and Daddy were also quite entertaining. Also, the quieliete wheelchair bound Dad. Really, just about everyone but Edward and Bella were entertaining.
- You can tell that the guy playing Jacob is wearing a wig/weave. It's terrible what they did to the poor kid's head.
- Bella is also flippin' crazy. At the end of the movie, her spastic, seizure-like reaction to Edward suggesting that he leave her is sickening. Maybe this is just bad acting on the actress's part, but this actually made me laugh out loud. Also, when they are sitting in chemistry class, she makes this weird face/tongue movement at Edward that was supposed to make her look like she wanted to say something to him, but instead ends up looking like she's trying to tongue the air. A little disturbing.
- Prom? Really? I know this is taking place in a highschool, but this is sooooo over the top, mushy crap. And the other boys trying to ask her to Prom is kinda 'eh' too. Why even bother with it in the movie if you're not really going to develop that plot line? It seemed like an after thought that was kinda tossed in for good measure, and because it was in the books. But, they could have spent more time actually developing some kind of romance between Edward and Bella instead of trying to have a whole gang of boys ask the new girl to the prom.
Oddly enough, the sparkles don't bother me. I like sparkles, though, so I'm biased. The baseball part was entertaining as well for the very small amount of time that it was on the screen. Quieliete werewolves, I am also cool with. The movie as a whole was awkward and poorly paced. It probably could have been good, but it was just so lacking. It didn't even feel like all the parts fitted together right. Also, after reading the wiki articles about the rest of the books in the series, I felt more disturbed. How come a girl who is apparently very independent, if a bit detached, turns into a suicidal moron whose existence depends on some impossibly perfect vampire? A hardened embryonic sack that has to be bitten through to get a baby out? Jacob is in love with her too? Ughhh.
#34
Posted 02 January 2009 - 05:38 PM
Huh... So I'm not the only one who thinks thatI never read the book and to this day don't watch the movie, because it always sounded like something a 12 year old girl who expected to be carried away from her parents by some bad boy after her parents told her she couldn't go to a dance... Idk, why...
- Edward is flippin' crazy. No, really. Pattinson said that he didn't really like the books (he felt like he was intruding on a mad woman's personal fantasies when he read it)
#35
Posted 03 January 2009 - 01:22 AM
- How exactly do these two characters fall in love? Through brief, awkward, stilted conversations? Stalking? A strong desire to eat one another? Is it cause he randomly saves her life with his uberpowers? They still don't know each other, really. Maybe the book had more to it, but it seems like they just fall in love (or suddenly feel rather murderous/hungry) at first glance (or smell), which is ludicrous. That's not love, that's lust (or hunger).
- Edward is flippin' crazy. No, really. Pattinson said that he didn't really like the books (he felt like he was intruding on a mad woman's personal fantasies when he read it) and felt that Edward was manic-depressive, so that is how he played the him in the movie. Maybe it's just me, but this made his entire performance just that much more erratic, stilted, and awkward. I also don't quite get that sense of him being formal/retaining oldworld charms from the movie. I hope it's more apparent in the books.
- The way he stared in horror at everything - very funny.
- You can tell that the guy playing Jacob is wearing a wig/weave. It's terrible what they did to the poor kid's head.
- Bella is also flippin' crazy. At the end of the movie, her spastic, seizure-like reaction to Edward suggesting that he leave her is sickening. Maybe this is just bad acting on the actress's part, but this actually made me laugh out loud. Also, when they are sitting in chemistry class, she makes this weird face/tongue movement at Edward that was supposed to make her look like she wanted to say something to him, but instead ends up looking like she's trying to tongue the air. A little disturbing.
The above makes me want to see the movie even more!
#36
Posted 06 January 2009 - 08:03 PM
My friends were fangirls for a time, so I read it just so they'd get off my back about it. I'm not a huge fan of vampire fiction, or romance, but it was okay.
Breaking Dawn personally scared me. >.<
And Bella? Oh gosh, don't even get me started on her. I absolutely agree with all of your comments about her- and might I mention that Edward destroyed her truck too?
#37
Posted 07 January 2009 - 06:31 AM
If there something I will say I liked about the book is that, the confrontation with James at the end was pretty good and the book felt shorter than it actually was. I got through half of it in about eight hours and that's pretty good with how slowly I normally go through books.
#38
Posted 10 January 2009 - 02:59 PM
To me, it was more like "The '08 Election is over time to focus on something else" >:|
Because the fanfare for it ended by December. I know people who loved the books, then about 2 months later they decided it was horrible and dislike it now. I think Twilight is a fad, when it comes to the end of the day. Who would love the books so strongly if it was just themselves reading it? Who would hate them so much if it was just themselves hating it? I know I'd dislike Twilight less if it was only me hating it and no one else. I know friends who NEVER would've read it except all their friends pressured them into it.
Fads are fads and you shouldn't let yourself be swept away too much into them.
#39
Posted 12 January 2009 - 03:44 AM
I rather liked the books. Don't get me wrong, that doesn't stop me from thinking the Edward is freaking Bi-Polar and Bella screams Mary Sue, but i found its plot to be quite fresh.
I don't really care anyways, different people like different things.
Oh, and Alice is awesome <3
#40
Posted 12 January 2009 - 09:37 PM
I must agree with that.Oh, and Alice is awesome <3
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users