
As for me, I love this game. Absolutely love it. Yes, it could have been better, but then again no game is perfect. Not even Mario Galaxy. Though it's pretty close

And I'm spent.
It's just that JoD was way too liberal with what it had already, and, like most problems when a game is too liberal and in this position, it didn't know what to do with itself. Looking at how people responded to JoD, I can say the community is really conservative <i>nostalgic wise</i>. We all wanted something that was like the original. Some people loved JoD and put aside what might have been wrong with it because it was a NiGHTS game, or because they didn't see the flaws as flaws, but rather bonuses (i.e.: NiGHTS's female voice; NiGHTS's big butt (that's a flaw 8D?) ); others found its flaws sticking out like a sore thumb and ended up feeling like there was so much wrong with the game that could've been fixed, and that it was so bad that it was painful to play.yeah, but i really am baffled to how a huge majority of the fans dislike the sequel, i really dont uderstand it. aww well
Or like me, who liked it but can defiantly see where they went wrong.Or you could be like me, who sees what's wrong with it, and is indifferent about it.
Considering how most of us here either used the nunchuk or the Gamecube controller, I have to say "no, it wasn't". Which is a damn shame considering the motion control 1. was why they chose Wii and 2. could've been perfect for this type of game.Were the motion controls really that integral to the gameplay?
That too; I wonder why I didn't add that o3o. I'm sorta like that; I sorta like it, but I can see where things would be better.Or like me, who liked it but can defiantly see where they went wrong.
If I may be honest, I don't think Sonic was such of a motivator in the 'to purchase, or not to purchase' choice of the public. I think it was more "Is this a good game, despite its frilliness?", or "Even if this is fun, this is too childish and/or frilly for me."if i was saying "Sonic the hedgehog" a lot of times is because people like him to not even notice NiGHTS.
ever since Sonic Heroes, all of the games Sega creates are now lame (except NiGHTS, he's cool)
Oh well. Better luck next time? Or maybe we shouldn't go there? :/
And note to Sega: making a game on Xbox or PS3 with better graphics will NOT instantly make the game better. Room for improvement in the graphics department? Yes. Instant win? No.
I agree with you. Nintendo has known what it's doing since Day 1, and they continue to work to get money and keep their PR in-touch. Microsoft, Kojima, Nintendo, Valve, they all do that. They all work with their customers and audience to get what will make both sides happy. SEGA works like EA has been; just wanting to get money and keep their company alive.I bet Nintendo could make it better. Ooh, that's right, I went there.
And note to Sega: making a game on Xbox or PS3 with better graphics will NOT instantly make the game better. Room for improvement in the graphics department? Yes. Instant win? No.
You gotta upload the image to the internet. It doesn't work like how you did it.The thing is,some people dont buy a game based on its review by a magazine,and i have a magazine scan,a gameinformer review scan of JoD *the only magazine out of the two i suscribe too that had a JoD Scan*
JoD Review
To tell you the truth I haven't played it yet though I've seen 50% of the game thanks to Derfsonic on YouTube. I don't even know if that gives me to go to say what I think of the game. Still, the game doesn't say Nintendo so that's another reason I don't think a lot of people want it. I dunno. I'm tired lolSo just a question. What did you guys think of what I posted? Pretty much the same as everyone huh? JoD should have been more spectacular. I really do feel left out, ripped off and disappointed with the game. Doesn't mean I still don't enjoy it, though. I still play it.
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users